Back in May, at the local elections, the Labour group were quick to celebrate their success at taking overall control of Sefton Council.
I have posted on the, often bizarre, tactics used by Labour to maintain control by using all the powers at their disposal.
The most recent example of their ruthlessness and lack of respect was the sacking of Maureen Fearn after 41 years service as a governor at Meols Cop High School.
The reason given by their Cabinet Member responsible was that "consideration was be given to the overall proportional composition of the political groups on the Council when LA representative governors come to the end of their term".
I cannot argue with the rules but I do not accept their interpretation.
There are, at present 14 vacant position on governing bodies of Sefton schools. These positions are earmarked for being taken up by the political groups.
The current political representation on Sefton Council is:
Conservative: 12%, Liberal Democrat: 30%, Labour: 55%, Other 3%.
The LA representation by political parties, until recently on governing bodies was:
Conservative: 24%, Liberal Democrat: 36%, Labour: 40%
By sacking Maureen the balance became:
Conservative: 24%, Liberal Democrat: 35%, Labour: 41%.
THis still leaves Labour 14% short of their expected representation on governing bodies.
What puzzles me is, why didn't the Labour group fill the 14 vacant positions with their own parties nominations?
Without getting my slide rule out, it doesn't take a mathematician to realise that by doing so the proportionality would be addressed without the need to rip apart successful governing bodies just for political gain.
The list of current vacancies is as follows:
putting politics before the best interests of schools does not go down well with me and I expect the voting public will feel the same.
Conservative: 24%, Liberal Democrat: 36%, Labour: 40%
By sacking Maureen the balance became:
Conservative: 24%, Liberal Democrat: 35%, Labour: 41%.
THis still leaves Labour 14% short of their expected representation on governing bodies.
What puzzles me is, why didn't the Labour group fill the 14 vacant positions with their own parties nominations?
Without getting my slide rule out, it doesn't take a mathematician to realise that by doing so the proportionality would be addressed without the need to rip apart successful governing bodies just for political gain.
The list of current vacancies is as follows:
List of vacancies and recommendations
SCHOOL VACANCY
CHURCH WARD
Waterloo Primary
Crosby (24.08.11) no nomination
DERBY WARD
Greenacre Nursery
Bootle (14.07.12) no nomination
FORD WARD
Hatton Hill Primary
Litherland (05.10.10) no nomination
LINACRE WARD
Thomas Gray Community Primary
Bootle (10.01.12) no nomination
LITHERLAND WARD
Lander Road Primary
Litherland (22.03.11) no nomination
Linacre Primary
Bootle (03.11.11) no nomination
NETHERTON & ORRELL WARD
St. Robert Bellarmine
Catholic Primary, Bootle (14.07.12) no nomination
PARK WARD
St. John Bosco Catholic Primary
Maghull Resignation (3.2.12) no nomination
RAVENMEOLS WARD
Our Lady of Compassion
Catholic Primary, Formby (27.10.12) no nomination
ST OSWALD WARD
Netherton Moss Primary
Netherton (13.07.10) no nomination
SUDELL WARD
St. George’s Catholic Primary
Maghull (26.06.12) no nomination
VICTORIA WARD
Forefield Infant School
Crosby (19.10.11) no nomination
(02.05.11) no nomination
Forefield Junior School
Crosby (15.5.11) no nomination
The figures in brackets indicate when the position became vacant.
PLease note that I have highlighted 2 of the schools where seats have been vacant for over 2 years!
There are 11 wards with vacancies that cannot be filled, but Labour decided that they needed to remove a Liberal Democrat governor from a school to redress the balance.
Or could it be that Labour are planning ahead for the local elections and putting candidates into schools in wards that they are likely to target. At the same time they leave schools with seats that have been vacant for months, or even years in 2 cases.
putting politics before the best interests of schools does not go down well with me and I expect the voting public will feel the same.

No comments:
Post a Comment